Hjtc (Xiamen) Industry Co., Ltd.
Supplier of the Pharmaceutical Packaginga &Steroids Raw Materials.
Sarm on behalf of "selective androgen receptor modulators," sarms with steroids (androgen receptors), the same which makes them influence on protein synthesis and steroids are the same, but in fact they are selective, which means they are more than the other groups for muscle, and steroid tend to affect more organizations, This has led many to believe that SARMs has no side effects.
So does SARMS work? SARMs increases protein synthesis, which promotes muscle growth. Are they as effective as steroids for muscle growth? Yes, they can be as effective as some steroids, but much less so, and side effects are often just as severe as using oral steroids!
This type of SARMS is almost as effective as testosterone on a per milligrgram basis, however, its "normal" dose is 20-40 mg/day, or 140 to 280 mg/week. For most people who use testosterone for muscle growth, 400 to 1,000 mg of exogenous testosterone per week is a fairly "normal" dose.
While RAD 140 appears to be quite safe at a dose of 20 mg per day (with some water storage and elevated blood pressure), it's also safe to say that 20 mg of testosterone is taken daily. In fact, Gunner would bet that a daily injection of 20 mg of exogenous testosterone would have fewer side effects than a daily dose of 20 mg of RAD 140!
At 20 mg a day, RAD 140 doesn't suppress endogenous TESTOSTERONE, but an injection of 20 mg of testosterone tomorrow certainly doesn't matter. If you take 100-150 mg a day of RAD 140, you're definitely suppressing your natural testosterone production. The body works in a feedback loop, if androgen receptors are overstimulated, The body will limit its production of androgens.
I do believe that SARMs have less inhibitory effect than steroids, mainly because most SARMs do not have a significant inhibitory effect on estrogen (which can also act as an inhibitory effect), but they certainly do when used "at the same dose as steroids". SARMS(mainly RAD and LGD) can be close to testosterone on a per milligram basis, but not as effective as many other steroids. Why? Because many steroids cause muscle growth through pathways other than androgen receptors, SARMs does not affect these pathways.
For example metandienone is a combination of a poor androgen receptors, but in building muscle and strength is stronger than testosterone, this is mainly because it affect cortisol inhibiting - either reducing the generation of cortisol, either reduce cortisol, the combination of other steroids have similar effects, metandienone also have strong dopaminergic action, when you stimulate dopamine receptor, You have increased activation of the central nervous system, which helps your muscles contract more tightly to a certain extent, and furtestosterone has a similar effect to gunblone.
In fact, trenbolone is really bad at increasing -- and possibly even decreasing -- protein synthesis, but it is very strong at reducing protein breakdown, resulting in a net synthesis effect. It is also a group of drug and put a testosterone make you more perfect one of the main reasons: they reduce cortisol, it is well known that cortisol by adding aldosterone and vasopressin and lead to water retention, but there is no the same effect - it metandienone increase the water retention - about because of aromatization of estrogen, so SARMS won't have such an effect. Thus, the more powerful SARMs, such as RAD 140 and LGD 4033, may be equivalent to testosterone on a mg to mg basis, but they lack other steroids. But honestly, if you ask any bodybuilder with experience using steroids, testosterone isn't a great product to develop an awesome physique (except for their first cycle). With just 500 mg of T, you're going to be very disappointed with the results, and with 280 mg of T a week, you're not going to see much of an additional increase. So 40 milligrams of RAD 140 won't give you Mr. Olympia's figure tomorrow.
SARMS is not without side effects, but because it does not transfer females and the male rate is not very high, SARMS does have fewer side effects in terms of prostate problems and blood lipids. However, at the same dose as steroids, SARMS inhibits your natural secretion of testosterone and can lead to large amounts of water retention and increase blood pressure. The true side effect most people experience with steroids is high blood pressure. At lower doses, SARMS does have far fewer side effects than most steroids, but if you take SARMS at the same dose as the true steroid cycle -- even for a conservative 700mg/week cycle -- your side effects increase.
MK677 is not SARM-- it's a peptide, but the MK-beginning drug is one of the worst products, it works primarily by increasing production of growth hormone, but it increases for so long that it gives you a lot of pulses over a period of 20 to 24 hours. So, it reduces insulin sensitivity really fast, and it also makes you store water like crazy, and overnight you gain 10 pounds of water. Drugs that start with MK also cause your blood pressure to soar, and most importantly MK677 inhibits your natural growth hormone because it takes so long!
Contact Person: Miss. june dai